What is Boundary Value Analysis in QA?

A 3D render of a residential building with architecture and landscaping featuring clean edges that are clearly defined..
Image ©2025 ux-qa.com

What is Boundary Value Analysis in QA?

Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) is an important method in manual QA and automation, driving efficient, effective testing of input ranges.

BVA is used in software testing to identify defects at the boundaries of input ranges rather than within the input’s typical range.

By focusing on edge cases, testers can confidently ensure the reliability of software components.


Boundary Value Analysis

  • Detect errors at the boundaries rather than the center of input ranges.
  • Minimize the number of test cases while maximizing coverage.
  • Ensure software handles edge cases correctly.
  • BVA is based on the observation that defects are more likely to occur at the edges of input domains, where changes from valid to invalid states happen.


When to Use BVA

  • When the application has a range of values as input (e.g., number fields, date ranges).
  • When testing input forms, calculations, and validation logic.
  • Ideal for functional testing, especially in boundary conditions.


How Boundary Value Analysis Works

  • Minimum Boundary (lowest valid input)
  • Just Above Minimum (value just above the minimum boundary)
  • Just Below Maximum (value just below the maximum boundary)
  • Maximum Boundary (highest valid input)
  • Invalid Boundaries (values just outside valid input range)


Valid Test Cases:

Minimum Boundary: 1

Just Above Minimum: 2

Maximum Boundary: 10

Just Below Maximum: 9


Invalid Test Cases:

Below Minimum: 0

Above Maximum: 11

This approach reduces the number of test cases compared to exhaustive testing while still covering critical scenarios.


Advantages of BVA

  • Reduces the number of test cases without missing critical bugs.
  • Ensures robustness by testing edge conditions.
  • Easy to design and implement.


Limitations of BVA

  • Not effective if boundaries are not well-defined.
  • Assumes bugs are more likely at boundaries, which may not always be true.
  • Can miss defects in the middle range of inputs.

Have anything to add? Let us know!

Previous Post Next Post

نموذج الاتصال